NFL’s Absurd “Equity” Rule Puts Fairness at Risk

The NFL’s Bizarre Rule: A Recipe for Disaster

When it comes to making sense of the National Football League’s rules, sometimes you just have to scratch your head. Take, for instance, the recent explanation by Mike Pereira on why boundary view cameras couldn’t be used to review a crucial play in a Bears game. The reasoning? “Question of equity.” Yes, you read that right – the NFL is more concerned about stadiums feeling left out than ensuring fair play.

A Flawed Logic

This rationale is mind-bogglingly stupid. It’s like saying we can’t use advanced medical equipment in hospitals because some smaller clinics don’t have access to it. Shouldn’t the focus be on providing the best possible tools for all teams, rather than holding everyone back due to a misguided sense of fairness?

A Billion-Dollar Industry’s Excuses

For an industry worth billions, it’s astonishing that the NFL wouldn’t simply ensure every stadium has the necessary technology. Instead, they’re creating rules to accommodate the haves and have-nots. This approach reeks of laziness and a lack of foresight.

The Real Question: What About Fairness on the Field?

The only thing that truly matters is fairness between the two teams competing. It’s irrelevant what other stadiums have or don’t have. Both teams operate under the same conditions, with or without boundary cameras, depending on the stadium they’re playing in. So, why the obsession with “equity”?

Scoring Plays: A Double Standard

Pereira did mention that boundary cameras could be used for official reviews in scoring plays. This raises more questions than answers. Is the NFL implying that “stadium equity” only matters in certain situations? It’s a glaring double standard that further highlights the absurdity of this rule.

A Colossal Mistake

This rule may not have significantly impacted the game, but its sheer stupidity takes the cake. By prioritizing “equity” over fairness, the NFL is essentially saying that some teams are more deserving of an advantage than others. It’s a flawed approach that undermines the very spirit of competition.

Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *