The Blame Game: When End Zone Paint Jobs Fail
In a stunning display of athletic prowess, Purdue’s De’Nylon Morrissette seemingly snagged a crucial touchdown catch in the corner of the end zone against No. 4 Penn State. However, a closer look revealed a harsh reality: Morrissette’s feet were planted firmly out of bounds.
A Design Flaw?
One can’t help but wonder if the end zone’s paint job played a significant role in this mishap. The six-inch-wide white line, often used to clearly demarcate inbounds and out-of-bounds areas, was nowhere to be found. Instead, the same color paint surrounded the white line, creating a visual obstacle course for players.
A Recipe for Disaster
It’s a wonder such errors don’t occur more frequently, given the design flaw. The lack of a clear visual distinction between inbounds and out-of-bounds areas can lead to confusion, even for the most skilled players. Morrissette, running at full speed, was likely oblivious to the boundary lines amidst the sea of black paint.
Assigning Blame
While Morrissette’s effort was commendable, the true culprit behind this blunder lies with the head groundskeeper. A public apology to Purdue fans is in order for the six points lost due to this avoidable mistake.
A Call to Action
It’s time for a reevaluation of end zone paint jobs across the league. A simple, clear design can make all the difference in preventing such errors. Let’s prioritize player safety and fair play by adopting a more practical approach to end zone design.
Leave a Reply