FIFA Schedule Criticized by European Football Chiefs and FIFPRO

Football’s Breaking Point: European Leagues and FIFPRO Unite Against FIFA

A landmark complaint has been filed against FIFA, the global football governing body, by the European Leagues and FIFPRO, the worldwide representative organization for professional footballers. The complaint, lodged with the European Commission in Brussels, alleges that FIFA is abusing its dual role as tournament organizer and regulator, prioritizing its own interests over player welfare.

The Tipping Point

LaLiga president Javier Tebas described the day of the filing as “one of the most important days in football.” Premier League boss Richard Masters echoed this sentiment, stating that football has reached a “tipping point.” The complaint marks a significant escalation in the long-standing dispute between FIFA and the European Leagues over the increasingly congested international match calendar.

Player Workload: A Growing Concern

The issue of player workload has become a hot topic in recent seasons, with players and coaches repeatedly urging organizers to condense the schedule and allow for more rest. Manchester City midfielder Rodri recently stated that players are “close” to going on strike over the issue. FIFPRO’s research shows that 72% of players support reducing the calendar and ensuring a mandated rest period.

FIFA’s Response

FIFA argues that its most recent calendar, set through to 2030, was approved by its council, which included FIFPRO and league bodies. However, FIFPRO claims that FIFA has consistently refused to consult with them on the issue. The governing body also maintains that its Club World Cup competition will have a minimal impact on the football calendar and player welfare.

A Saturated Calendar

Serie A chief executive Luigi De Siervo pointed out that while domestic leagues have not increased the number of games, FIFA and UEFA have continually expanded their competitions. This has led to a saturation point in the calendar, with many teams playing over 50 matches per season. FIFPRO and the European Leagues argue that FIFA’s actions are driven by self-interest rather than a concern for player welfare.

The Antitrust Complaint

The complaint filed with the European Commission alleges that FIFA is abusing its dominant position in the market. FIFPRO and the European Leagues claim that FIFA’s actions are restricting competition and harming the interests of players and domestic leagues. The complaint is not the only case against FIFA regarding the international match calendar, with domestic players unions in England, France, and Italy also taking legal action.

A Mandated Rest Period

One of the key aims of the complaint is to establish a mandated rest period for players. FIFPRO’s research shows that 30% of players had a sequence of six “back-to-back” matches last season, highlighting the need for a break. The complaint also seeks to reduce the calendar and ensure that player welfare is prioritized.

A Landmark Case

The antitrust complaint against FIFA marks a significant moment in the history of football. The outcome of the case will have far-reaching implications for the sport, shaping the future of the international match calendar and the relationship between FIFA, the European Leagues, and FIFPRO. As Mathieu Moreuil, Premier League director of international football relations and EU affairs, stated, “Enough is enough, we can’t take it anymore.”

Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *