The Age-Old Debate: Quarterback or Running Back?
It’s a pet peeve that gets under my skin every year. People on the internet insist on calling a certain NFL player a running back, and it’s just plain wrong. This individual is, in fact, a quarterback – an extremely talented one at that.
Let’s put this debate to rest with a simple thought experiment. Imagine two quarterbacks, Alex and Ryan, with identical game-winning performances against equal opponents. Their stats look like this:
Alex: 34-44, 302 YDS, 3 TD, 1 INT + 8 YDS RUSH
Ryan: 4-12, 120 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT + 210 YDS RUSH, 3 TD
Who was the better quarterback that day? Any objective observer would say Ryan, despite his lower passing numbers. After all, he contributed an additional 30 yards and a touchdown through his rushing ability.
The point is, a quarterback’s ability to move the ball downfield shouldn’t be limited to just passing. Running is an integral part of the position, and Ryan’s legs gave him a significant advantage.
So, why do people insist on diminishing this quarterback’s accomplishments by calling him a running back? Are they suggesting he shouldn’t be considered a top quarterback due to his unorthodox style? Or perhaps they’re implying that he’s not a “real” quarterback because he doesn’t fit the traditional mold?
Let’s be clear: this quarterback may not be the most accurate passer, but he can still make throws and extend plays with his legs. He’s a master of improvisation, and his unique skillset makes him a nightmare to defend.
In the end, it’s about winning, and this quarterback has done just that – 62 times in 87 NFL games, to be exact. So, let’s put this debate to rest and acknowledge what’s obvious: this player is a phenomenal quarterback, and he deserves to be recognized as such.
Leave a Reply